All About Money ..

Showing posts with label Congress. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Congress. Show all posts

Monday, November 18, 2013

Coal Allocation Scam - Essay

coal allocation scam
Another scam in a history of Indian. Coal mining controversy is major fraud in 2012, which involved Rs 1,86,000 Cr loss to exchequer . This is serious allegation against Prime Minister of India Dr Manmohan Singh who is in a serious scrutiny of the CAG which leads to protest against the leading political party NCP and Prime Minister Dr. Manmohan Singh asking for his resignation.

Social activist Arvind Kajrewal and IAC(India against corruption) activist marched to the Prime Minister, Congress and Bhartiya Janata party’s member’s residence in Delhi. The Police had to use tear gas and water cannons to prevent crowd entering in these residences

The CAG report claiming loss of 1,86,000 to national exchequer by not ensuring transparency during the period of 2004-2009. The Controller and Audit General (CAG) has arrived estimated loss based on the average cost of production and sale price of open cast mines of Coal India during 2010-2011. The PMO also suspected for delaying a decision on competitive bidding which is under Regulation and Development Act 1957 which could have been implemented way back in 2006. The process of competitive bidding was initiated way back in 2006-09, after correspondence amount various ministers for 2 years the later it was dropped though Development of legal Affairs and law secretory of the time stood against the decision.

One of the biggest beneficiary of the coal allocation is Anil Ambani’s Reliance Power Limited(RPL). Un November 2007, Madhya Pradesh Chief Minister Shivraj Singh Chauhan requested Prime Minister to RPL to use the surplus coal of captive blocks of Sasan Plant. The recommendation of Empowered group of Minister was considered and it was granted , the decision resulted in a benefit Rs 29,033 Crore with a net present value (NPV) 11,852 crore to the project developer. The reort says 25 firms including Essar Power, Hindalco, Tata Steel, Tata Power and Jindal steel and power gained Rs 1.86 crore from coal allocation.

The coal allocation scam resulted in a deadlock in the parliament Loksabha as well as Rajhasabha for four consecutive days. BJP Leader Sushma swaraj and Arun Jeithely arguned that since Dr Singh was in charge of coal mining during this period and he should take moral responsibility of the ‘Coalgate’ scam and resign from the post. Advocate M.L Sharma have filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) in the supreme court seeing for cancellation of 194 blocks based on illegality and unconstitutionality. As a result of this litigation, the Supreme Court of India, in its September 2012 hearing has ordered the government in power on basis of not following policy of competitive bidding for coal allocation. The interminister group (IMC) has recommended de-allocation of 4 coal block.

Union Coal Minister Saipradad Jaiswal along with UPA leaders rejected the CAG report. According to Union coal minister the policy which adopted for coal allocation blocks was not faulty. The CAG report is based on few aspect of the coal allocation. The Prime minister of India Dr. Manmohan Singh in his defect made statement regarding First CAG charge to parliament directly instead of discussing with PAC (Public Account committee) addressing the finding of the Final CAG report. Hereafter Primer Minister’s statement.

Stretching 32 points paragraph, Singh’s main argument makes below main points –
-Firstly, computation of extractable reserves based on averages would not be correct.

- Secondly, the cost of production of coal varies significantly from mine to mine even for CIL due to varying geo-mining conditions, method of extraction, surface features, number of settlements, availability of infrastructure etc.

- Thirdly, CIL has been generally mining coal in areas with better infrastructure and more favorable mining conditions, whereas the coal blocks offered for captive mining are generally located in areas with more difficult geological conditions.

-Fourthly, a part of the gains would in any case get appropriated by the government through taxation and under the MMDR Bill, presently being considered by the parliament, 26% of the profits earned on coal mining operations would have to be made available for local area development. Therefore, aggregating the purported financial gains to private parties merely on the basis of the average production costs and sale price of CIL could be highly misleading. Moreover, as the coal blocks were allocated to private companies only for captive purposes for specified end-uses, it would not be appropriate to link the allocated blocks to the price of coal set by CIL.

-The major mines and lignite bearing states like West Bengal, Chhattisgarh, Rajasthan, Jharkhand and Orissa were opposite party were ruling and in opposed to switch to the process competitive bidding.

Before getting into any conclusion regarding sole responsibility of the scam, we should have keep in mind all prospective. Since 1993, allocation of captive coal blocks was being done on the basis of recommendations made by an inter-Ministerial Screening Committee which also had representatives of State governments. Allocation of coal blocks to private companies for captive use commenced in 1993, after the Coal Mines (Nationalisation) Act, 1973 was amended. This was done with the objective of attracting private investments in specified end uses

Bhartiya Janata Party whose demanded for resignation of Prime Minister owing the moral responsibility of scam however BJP should have grabbed the opportunity UPA governments offer to have discussion on the issue. This can be possibility, BJP is avoiding the discussion with government because audit report turned out to be equally guilty unflattering itself. According to CAG report two of them major states Chhattisgarh and Rajasthan had opposed the competitive bidding. The then chief minister of Chhattisgarh Dr. Raman Singh wrote a letter to PM saying bidding in coal blocks would make steel industry unviable and Vasungharah Raje, past CM of Rajasthan opposed saying it is against Sarkaria commission recommendation.

Hence, it is clear that not only leading party is involve in the ‘Coalgate’ scam, whoever is involved in it one this is for sure, the corruption of India are growing day by day which is impacting the economy and growth of India. As a citizen of India, we should choose the wise leader for country, The duty of youth is to challenge corruption.

==================================================

The Indian coal allocation scam or the most famous coal controversy in 2012 has resulted in a widespread distress among the citizens and the anti-corruption protesters and the anger has come out in the form of street demonstrations against the ruling party and the prime minister of India Mr. Manmohan Singh.

Arvind Kejriwal, anti -corruption activist and Anna Hazare along with his team marched towards the residences of the Prime Minister, Congress Party and Bharatiya Janata Party members residences. The police had to use tear gas and water cannons to prevent the crowd from entering these residences.

Considered as one of the biggest scam in the last decade, the Indian coal allocation scam is a political controversy highlighting the nation’s irregularities in the matter of handling national coal deposits.

Bharatiya Janata Party, the party in opposition has stated that the ruling party, the Congress have made irregular distribution allocation of the coal deposits between the public sector entities and the private companies during the period from 2004 to 2009.

As a matter of fact the estimate in total of the coal scandal is nearly Rs. 1,067,303 crore. The Comptroller and Auditor General of India have accused the Prime Minister Manmohan Singh as being involved in the scandal and want him to resign from his post.

The coal allocation scam has resulted in a deadlock in the parliament as a result of which only seven parliament sessions took place in the month of August instead of the usual twenty. A Public Interest Litigation has been filed by advocate M. L. Sharma as a request to cancel the allocation of all the 194 coal blocks on the grounds of illegality and unconstitutionality.

As a result of this litigation, the Supreme Court of India, in its September 2012 hearing has ordered the government in power, the Congress to state the reasons for not following the 2004 policy of competitive bidding for coal block allocation.

Whoever is involved in the coal allocation scam, one thing is for sure that the roots of corruption in India are growing deeper and deeper day by day. Bharatiya Janata Party, the strongest party in opposition has stated that as many as 142 coal blocks have been allocated to private entrepreneur’s, most of whom were not even actual users and traders.

The ruling party, Congress and Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, have stated that all these allegations are completely false and the Government of India will look into the matter with deepest concerned.

http://www.preservearticles.com/2012100333279/essay-on-indian-coal-mining-controversy-coal-scam.html


Food Security Bill - A poll gimmick or anti hunger action plan

Emphasising about the biggest programme in the world to fight hunger, the monsoon session of the Parliament passed the food security bill after long contradictions and allegations. Even though there are several accusations before passing the bill, the government successfully passed the bill with a view to eradicate the hunger of the poor.

The bill benefits 67% of the total 1.2 Billion people. The Bill ensures the BPL (Below Poverty Level) category of people to have rice for 3 rupees, wheat for 2 rupees and other coarse grain for 1 rupee. Besides the subsidies the bill also ensures healthy food for the women and also for the children below 14 years of age. I.e. A pregnant woman or a lactating mother is eligible to get free meals under this scheme. They are also eligible to have a maternity benefit of Rs.6000 for the next 6 months after the child Birth.

By closely examining the salient features of the scheme, it clearly indicates that the bill focuses on wiping out the hunger of the poor by providing sufficient food as subsidies every month. Being a centrally sponsored scheme, the central government is totally responsible for the smooth functioning of this scheme. Currently the allocation of the grains in different states is under the arms of the central government. Also in case of the shortage of the food grains the central government will issue funds to the state government for managing the crisis. I.e. if a family doesn't get their subsidy, they are eligible for getting a monthly allowance accordingly.

Due to the wide perspective of the bill, the bill has gained good public attention as it is a scheme concentrated on eradicating the hunger of the poor and thereby gradually exterminates the poverty in the country.

On the stage of passing the Bill in the Parliament, the opposition came forward several accusations. They claimed that the farmers who manufacture these grains won't get any benefits. Also the opposition highlighted that they are the ones who started the plan at the time of their government and Chhattisgarh has already implemented such measure. But the central government kept aside all the allegations and explained the benefits of the scheme that is meant for the poor and needy.

By the time of passing the bill, contradictions were plenty as the ruling party claimed that the opposition is blocking the benefit meant for the poor, whereas the opposition came forward claiming that the allegations are baseless..!! Anyhow after long contradictions and allegations the food security bill had passed successfully by the UPA government and it is a real milestone in path of their governance.

The Bill is completely an anti-hunger action plan. If it had been launched into action before a couple of years back, it would have changed the scenario of our country entirely. If the hunger of the poor is completely eliminated, it will lead our country to a much better situation economically and globally.

Some More Readings -->